| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
otr002
Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Posts: 8 Location: Brisbane Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:08 pm
Post subject: Franken Bell or just unusual? |
|
|
Been looking for a black 4005 for a while and found this listed as a 4005-7000, so what is it? I think i know but am not an authority
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John N

Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 874 Location: Southern California USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:04 am
Post subject: |
|
|
I feel pretty confident saying that is not a 4005. 4005's are date only, without a daywheel.
That looks like a Franken, maybe even a re-dial. The case style looks like a -603x but it might be a -700x.
Photos sometimes don't replace a 1000 words.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sempervivens

Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:07 am
Post subject: I know what it is ! |
|
|
| Quote: | I think i know but am not an authority
|
It is a nice addition for JohnN's picture collection of Franken's and redials !
The 4005 caseback is not original.
It looks like a 603x case, with a refinished dial.
Non original hands (not sure here, in the picture they look gold tone).
The alarm button doen't look too good. _________________ Vanitas vanitatum, et omnia vanitas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
otr002
Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Posts: 8 Location: Brisbane Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:18 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| As i thought a franken bell, so sad, o well the search goes on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sempervivens

Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:22 am
Post subject: yes quite sad |
|
|
on first sight this watch looks nice
'coz the 603x cushion case style is lovely
but if the dial is refinished, that may not look so nice in close-up
IMHO the alarm ring is also not original for the 603x style. _________________ Vanitas vanitatum, et omnia vanitas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|